Chelsea Handler Five Years On: Why She Still Hasn’t Moved into an ‘Unlivable’ L.A. Home

chelsea handler says she bought a $5. 9 million Los Angeles home from RFK Jr. and Cheryl Hines through a private trust and has not been able to move into the property for five years, calling the condition a “disaster” and the house “the most toxic environment. “

What Happens When Chelsea Handler Buys Blindly?

Handler described purchasing the house anonymously, through a private trust, and only learning the identity of the sellers after the sale. When inspectors opened parts of the house, they judged the property unlivable; Handler relayed that inspectors told her the house was “the most toxic environment” and that it could not be lived in for at least two years.

Handler criticized the sellers for leaving her with the problem and relayed that Cheryl Hines left a note offering help, a note Handler dismissed with a wry retort about the house’s missing foundation. A person close to the situation said Handler had every opportunity to inspect the home prior to the sale and that responsibility for uncovering relevant issues ultimately rests on the inspector and the buyer.

What Is the Current State of the Property?

Public statements by the parties portray the home as profoundly troubled. Handler called the house a “disaster” and said she still has not lived in it five years after purchase. Inspectors told Handler they found conditions that made the house uninhabitable for at least two years.

• Buyer’s report: foundation problems noted by Handler as central to unlivability.
• Inspector assessment: described the house as “the most toxic environment” and unfit for immediate habitation.
• Seller remediation: Cheryl Hines said a redo uncovered an “illegal” outdoor storage unit that needed removal.

The parties’ public comments characterize multiple, sequential problems: fundamental structural concerns raised after purchase, follow-on remediation that revealed additional issues, and continued dispute over where responsibility lies.

What Comes Next for Buyer and Sellers?

Handler framed the episode with sarcasm and annoyance but also with a deflating shrug—”I’m not angry about it or anything. I’m totally over it. ” She joked about unlikely remedies and noted the practical reality that she has not been able to occupy the house for years. Cheryl Hines has described removing an illegal outdoor storage unit discovered after repair work.

Representatives for Handler and for RFK Jr. had no immediate comment on the situation. The person close to the matter emphasized that inspection opportunities were available before the sale and suggested responsibility for discovering issues falls on the inspector and the buyer, leaving the transaction’s aftermath in limbo.

At this moment, the facts in the public record are narrow: a $5. 9 million home bought through a private trust, seller identities revealed after the sale, inspectors deeming the house uninhabitable for at least two years, subsequent remediation uncovering further problems, and competing characterizations of responsibility. Observers should expect continued debate over liability and occupancy, while the house itself remains central to the dispute and unresolved for chelsea handler