côme – roma is the headline fixture of the 29th round, with official formations released and Como’s coach offering a candid pre-match read on selection and tactics.
What Happens When Côme – Roma Meet?
The two sides enter the match with clearly defined formations. Como line up in a 4-2-3-1: Butez in goal; a back four of Ramon, Diego Carlos, Kempf and Smolcic; a midfield pairing of Sergi Roberto and Da Cunha with Alex Valle also listed; and an attacking line featuring Nico Paz, Caqueret and Baturina. Cesc Fabregas is listed as Como’s coach.
Roma present a 3-4-2-1: Svilar in goal; a defensive trio of Hermoso, Mancini and Ghilardi; Celik and Wesley among the wide or wing options with Koné and Cristante in central roles; and an attacking cluster of Pellegrini, El Shaarawy supporting Malen at the tip. Gian Piero Gasperini is named as Roma’s coach.
Those formations place a single Como striker against a Roma front that features one central forward supported by two attackers, while the defensive shapes contrast a Como back four with Roma’s back three. The official selections make the structural differences between the sides explicit before kickoff.
What If Fabregas’s Remarks Alter the Match Narrative?
Fabregas framed his match-day choices in practical terms. He confirmed that Perrone is included in the squad and that the priority was having players who trained fully during the week. He described the false nine as an alternative rather than a rigid tactical switch, presenting it as one option among different attacking profiles. Fabregas also emphasized a process-focused view: the match is important but not definitive for the club’s longer project and growth.
On external criticism, Fabregas acknowledged that coaches hold different ideas and that differing views do not change Como’s internal work on identity. He noted the need for players with personality and quality to deal with physically demanding matches, and highlighted that selection choices aim to reflect those needs.
Taken together, the lineups and Fabregas’s words signal a balancing act: Como has committed to a 4-2-3-1 shape on paper while retaining tactical flexibility through selection, and the coach is prioritizing players who completed full training. Roma’s 3-4-2-1 selection under Gasperini sets up a structural contrast that both coaching staffs will need to manage in-game.
What Happens Next?
With formations published and clear coach statements ahead of the fixture, the immediate variables to monitor are personnel fitness and how each side interprets its listed shape on the pitch. Fabregas’s emphasis on available, fully trained players implies Como may prefer consistency and readiness over late changes. The match will therefore be decided by the execution of the stated formations and the ability of each side to convert those structures into effective in-game actions.
For readers following the fixture, the combination of Como’s named 4-2-3-1, Roma’s 3-4-2-1, and Fabregas’s pre-match framing creates a concrete template for what to expect and what to watch: selection reliability, the false-nine option’s deployment, and which formation control points determine the contest between the two teams.
